index.php

Newborn Orca ‘Baby Boom’ Depends Upon Our Breaching Deadbeat Dams

Posted /Uncategorized

Brenda Peterson
Huffington Post Blog

“It’s rare with any endangered species to rejoice–but the birth of six new orca whale calves this year to the J, K, and L pods has the Pacific Northwest breaching for joy. In any culture, we celebrate long-awaited births with gifts. What can we offer these orca families to commemorate their newborns, this happy “baby boom” after three years of heart-breaking losses of their calves? We can finally make good our government promises by tearing down the Snake River dams and so help nourish orcas with the Chinook salmon they need to thrive.” Read full article…

Save southern resident orcas while we can

Posted /Uncategorized

The Olympian
Letter to the Editor
Christina M. Price, Rochester

I just finished reading “Into Great Silence” by Eva Saulitis about a pod of 22 transient orcas that frequented Prince William Sound. The pod will become extinct in our lifetime because of the Exxon Valdez disaster.

We are the stewards of three resident pods of orcas and if we don’t do something now we will guarantee their extinction. The southern resident killer whales have enjoyed a lot of press recently with the births of five baby orcas. Don’t let the baby boom fool you – these pods are on the brink of disaster. The number of females of reproductive age in each pod is dangerously low.

Of the five babies born this year only one is confirmed female. The runs of chinook salmon, their main food, are close to extinction. Oil companies are fighting to increase tanker traffic in The Salish Sea; one spill could virtually wipe out all three pods.

So what do we do? First, support The Center for Whale Research; they need members and financial support to continue their vital work.

Second, tell your government it’s time to demolish the dams on the Snake River to give salmon a fighting chance to recover, and let them know you are against oil tanker traffic in The Salish Sea. We must seize our chance to save the southern residents while we still can. If we don’t we will have no one to blame but ourselves when the last southern resident takes its last breath into great silence.

The Case for Breaching the Four Lower Snake River Dams to Recover Wild Snake River Salmon

Posted /Uncategorized

Prepared by: Carl Christianson, Biologist, retired USACE; Sharon Grace, Attorney; Jim Waddell, P.E., retired USACE

This report was sent to the following officials in early November 2015:

Senator Patty Murray
Senator Maria Cantwell
Governor Jay Inslee
LTG Thomas P. Bostick–USACE
Jo-Ellen Darcy–USACE
Eileen Sobeck–NOAA
Sally Jewell–Secty, Dept of Interior
Christy Goldfuss–CEQ
Sonya L. Baskerville–DOE/BPA
Rep. Hans Dunshee–WA State
Rep. Jim McDermott
Rep. Derek Kilmer
Senator Mike Crapo, Idaho
Rep. Rick Larsen
Governor Kate Brown, Oregon
Jim Unsworth–Director, WDFW

Special December 12th Screening of Damnation with a Q&A Following the Film

Posted /Uncategorized

More info can be found here.

This powerful film odyssey across America explores the sea change in our national attitude from pride in big dams as engineering wonders to the growing awareness that our own future is bound to the life and health of our rivers. Dam removal has moved beyond the fictional Monkey Wrench Gang to go mainstream. Where obsolete dams come down, rivers bound back to life, giving salmon and other wild fish the right of return to primeval spawning grounds, after decades without access. DamNation’s
majestic cinematography and unexpected discoveries move through rivers and landscapes altered by dams, but also through a metamorphosis in values, from conquest of the natural world to knowing ourselves as part of nature.

Watch the trailer here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X2dYnTX55E

Following the film we will have a Q&A session with special guests.

JIM WADDELL, Retired Army Corps Engineer

Jim Waddell is featured in the film, and is working to expose the enormous and growing economic costs of the Lower Snake River Dams.

SHARON GRACE, orca advocate, consumer attorney, and coordinator of Southern Resident Killer Whale Chinook Salmon Initiative (SRKW CSI). SRKWCSI is working on political campaigns to help remove the Lower Snake River Dams in order to save the Southern Resident orcas and salmon populations.

D.A. GILES, Research Director at the Center for Whale Research.

CARL CHRISTIAN, salmon biologist, Retired Army Corps Engineer

Come prepared to learn about this incredibly important issue surrounding the Puget Sound orcas and salmon. You will have the opportunity to make a real difference the night of the event and you will leave inspired to do more.

Please join us for this special evening in Edmonds, WA

*This is a free event but donations are welcome. 100% of the donations collected will go towards the efforts to breach the dams and revive the orca and salmon populations.

WHEN

WHERE

The Edmonds Theater – 415 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020

Smithsonian: Removing a Dam Can Be a Net Win for the Planet

Posted /Uncategorized

Americans have been building dams to harness rivers for energy production, irrigation, flood control and water storage since the late 1800s. To fuel a growing appetite for electricity, dam building reached a crescendo around World War II. At the time, hydropower provided three-quarters of the West’s electricity and one-third of the country’s, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

But its grip on the country’s power grid has slipped amid competing energy sources, and today hydropower provides just one-tenth of the country’s electricity.

Read the article in full…

American Fisheries Conference Explores Hatchery Issues, Hatchery/Wild Fish Interactions, Resiliency

Posted /Uncategorized

Some five billion hatchery salmon and steelhead are released into the North Pacific each year, including fish from 155 salmon, steelhead and trout hatcheries in the Northwest. But it’s the natural populations of fish that biologists believe to be the most resilient to climate change, according to a series of oral presentations at the 145th American Fisheries Society conference in Portland.

With three treatments of fish production – segregated hatchery, integrated or conservation hatchery, and reserved areas for natural spawning only – it’s the segregated model that seems to be disappearing from use. Part of the reason may be the fitness of hatchery salmon, according to many of the speakers at the conference.

Read the bulletin here…

‘Record salmon runs’ actually a decline

Posted /Uncategorized

Idaho Statesman / Guest Opinion
By Don Chapman
Dec. 7, 2015

Propagandists for the lower four Snake River dams like to depict recent salmon returns as “record runs.” Most recently, Lt. Col. Tim Vail, of the Corps of Engineers, spoke of “record” salmon runs when he touted dam benefits. This self-serving assessment demands careful review. “Record runs” cannot describe the status of ESA-listed spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Snake River.

The most unbiased assessment of the status of wild spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Snake basin derives from spawning nest (redd) counts by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game each year after 1956. The department has counted redds in the same index areas of the Middle Fork Salmon River from 1957 through 2015.

The two-thirds reduction in redd counts depicts only part of the population decline. From 1957 to ’61, fisheries in the Columbia River harvested half of all spring Chinook that entered the Columbia River. In recent years the harvest of spring Chinook, mostly by Indian fisheries, has amounted to less than 10 percent. Adjusting for this half-century drop in harvest, I estimate that wild spring Chinook salmon have suffered a decline in abundance of 80 percent rather than 65 percent.

What accounts for a reduction of 80 percent in numbers of wild spring/summer Chinook salmon? Most importantly, the National Marine Fisheries Service documented very low survival at dams in the lower Snake and main Columbia rivers for several decades. Even recently, only about 50 percent of wild juveniles that migrated in-river reached the tailrace of Bonneville Dam.

When discussing dam passage in the Snake River, the NMFS persists in using a “dam passage survival” objective (across the concrete) of 96 percent. But NMFS data typically show a survival of about 92 percent per dam project (pool and dam combined) for wild spring Chinook smolts as they pass through the several lower Snake projects. “Project mortality” through each of the eight main stem hydro projects accounts for the 50 percent overall survival to Bonneville Dam. More juveniles die after they reach the estuary from injury or stress incurred while migrating through the hydropower system. Also, NMFS reports indicate that the smolt migration experience affects their upstream migration success when they return as adults. Thus, “across concrete” loss is only a part of total project-related mortality.

To increase toward recovery, wild spring/summer Chinook salmon must survive from smolt to adult at 2 to 6 percent (average objective 4 percent). Recent survivals have been less than 1 percent. Steelhead survival has also remained far below the recovery objective. Lt. Col. Vail’s is just one voice among many that conveniently slide over that issue.

As the Columbia River basin continues to warm over the coming decades, natal streams will produce fewer ESA-listed wild spring Chinook and steelhead juveniles to migrate seaward. Yet the new NMFS Biological Opinion fails to anticipate a need for main-stem river management that would substantially reduce “project mortality.” It ignores studies of removal of the lower Snake Dams or increased spill, and relies on the wobbly crutch of habitat improvement. But habitat improvement has no utility for listed spring Chinook in tributaries in wilderness or primitive areas.

Readers of propaganda from federal hydro operators and Port of Lewiston should beware the siren songs of “record salmon runs.”

Don Chapman studied and taught fish management and ecology for 50 years, with most of that effort devoted to salmon and steelhead of the Columbia River basin. He worked for state and federal agencies and public utilities, and was the founder of a consulting firm.

Climate Change: Idaho Could Be Safe Haven for Native Fish

Posted /Uncategorized

Eric Barker
Lewiston Tribune
Dec. 30, 2015

Idaho’s vertical geography may give salmon, steelhead and other native fish a fighting chance as climate change continues to alter their habitat for the worse.

 Scientists say resident fish like cutthroat trout and bull trout will still have plenty of clean, cool water in the Gem State. The mountain spawning grounds of anadromous fish like salmon and steelhead will still be productive. But the powerful sea-run fish will face uncertain conditions in the ocean and find it even more difficult to negotiate the heavily altered habitat in the Snake and Columbia rivers.
Most climate models show future Idaho receiving about the same or slightly more precipitation than it does now. With rising air temperatures, modeling predicts more of that moisture will fall as rain instead of snow. Spring floods that flush juvenile salmon and steelhead to the ocean and help them pass dams on the Snake and Columbia rivers will likely arrive earlier and be shorter in duration and volume.

Mountain streams that depend on melting snow to feed them throughout the summer will see lower flows and higher temperatures. That effect will cascade downstream where mainstem rivers will also see lower flows and higher temperatures.

Climate scientists are less certain about what will happen in the ocean. But they say there could be less of the upwelling that helps seed the upper layers with nutrients that feed the base of the food chain. The ocean, too, is expected to become more acidic, a problem for many lower-food-chain species.

To get an idea of what the climate might be like for salmon, steelhead and trout, look no further than last summer. The entire Pacific Northwest saw meager snowfall, much-reduced runoff and high summer stream temperatures. Sockeye salmon were hit the hardest. Returning adults faced unprecedented high water temperatures and the run melted away as the fish stalled or perished in the Snake and Columbia rivers.

“Redfish Lake sockeye are probably the most at risk,” said Lisa Crozier, a research ecologist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Northwest Science Center in Seattle. “They are in the river at the worst time of year.”

Ocean conditions were poor, which led to weak returns of fish like coho salmon.

“I think this summer in many ways was a climate change stress test on Northwest salmon habitat,” said Nate Mantua, climate and fisheries scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Santa Cruz, Calif. “You could see which runs were especially vulnerable to a situation with much higher temperatures, much reduced snowpack in our mountains and about average precipitation for Northwest watersheds.”

But Dan Isaak, a U.S. Forest Service fisheries biologist in Boise, said Idaho’s salmon and trout may be better off than those in other Northwest states. Because Idaho is steep, ranging in elevation from 750 feet at the mouth of the Clearwater River in Lewiston to more that 12,600 feet at Borah Peak in the Lost River Range, there is great hope that even if climate change shrinks the range of some native fish, that enough cold water habitat will remain for the species to be viable.

“We are a really steep state, which creates a strong temperature gradient,” he said. “So as things warm up, the temperature isotherm doesn’t shift nearly as far as it does in a flat place. That has a really dominating effect on how much the thermal habitat is going to shift.”

In many cases, Isaak said, cold water fish species may be able to simply move upstream, sometimes as little as a few kilometers. Fish that live in places where the habitat is on the verge of being too warm will be in trouble. But high mountain streams that are too cold today to promote adequate fish growth might become ideal in the future. For example, there are places where it is simply too frigid for cutthroat trout to thrive.

“They are going to gain (habitat) at about the same rate on the top end as they are going to lose it at the bottom end.”

Bull trout will also likely find enough cold water to persist in Idaho, Isaak said. But they are likely to suffer more than cutthroat. Bull trout — actually a char — occur at low densities and need large expanses of cold water. They are not limited by frigid temperatures at the highest elevations. So as streams warm from the bottom up, bull trout habitat will be squeezed.

 “Wherever it’s warming up, they are gradually losing habitat,” Isaak said.

The big problem for salmon and steelhead won’t be the habitat where the adults spawn and the juveniles hatch and rear before going to the ocean. The pinch point will likely be the migration corridor when adults and juveniles will be forced to deal with less and warmer water in the dam-altered Snake and Columbia rivers.

If the unprecedented conditions of last summer become more common by the middle of the century, Mantua said, some species of salmon and steelhead will be hard-pressed to adjust.

“Some salmon have evolved a calendar that has worked for many centuries. But if the climate changes the way models suggest it will in the next 50, 60, 70 years, that life history becomes difficult and maybe untenable.”

Mantua said salmon have displayed great adaptive capacity over thousands of years, and given a chance that ability will help them deal with climate change.

“If we can build what people talk about — resilience — just by providing more and more options for them on the freshwater and estuary side, I think that gives them a lot of hope for dealing with a future with a lot of change because that is what they have always done.”

To Save the World’s Most Endangered Killer Whale, You Need to Save Its Dinner

Posted /Uncategorized

Groundbreaking research finds that imperiled Chinook salmon are crucial to the survival of Southern Resident orcas.

Published on takepart and Yahoo News
Jan. 15, 2016

The survival of the world’s most endangered killer whales may hinge on whether another species threatened with extinction can also be saved.

A new study has definitively shown for the first time that Chinook salmon—which are endangered from northern California to Washington and inland to Idaho—comprise 70 percent of the summer diet of the Southern Resident killer whales, three pods of about 89 orcas that live mainly in the inland marine waters of the Pacific Northwest.

The Southern Residents prefer Chinook even at times when other salmon species, such as sockeye and coho, are abundant, according to research published in the journal PLOS ONE.

Scientists and other observers have long known that salmon are the favored prey of the Southern Residents, said Michael Ford, a biologist with the United States National Marine Fisheries Service, who led the study. But the study “reconfirms the importance of Chinook salmon to this particular group of killer whales.”

“To save the orcas, we need healthy salmon runs,” agreed Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director and senior counsel with the Center for Biological Diversity. “I think one of the key things is passage through dams and diversions. We need restoration of the native salmon runs. We also need to take into account water flow and make sure that salmon are getting enough water flow downstream.”

The center is one of many conservation groups advocating for the removal of dams on Washington state’s lower Snake River, arguing that fully unblocking the river is crucial to restoring salmon runs.

Chinook salmon began returning to their historic spawning grounds on Washington state’s Elwha River in 2014, the same year an effort to bring down a century-old dam on the river was completed.

To figure out the role fish play in the orcas’ diet, Ford and his team reviewed DNA analysis of 175 fecal samples—whale poop—collected in the wild between 2006 and 2011.

As past research had proven that these orcas were almost exclusively fish eaters, the team tested the samples for the DNA signatures of different regional fish species to learn which ones the killer whales ate most

“With fecal samples, we get around some of the uncertainty of whether remains on surface [of the water] are representational of the entire diet,” Ford said. “They integrate their diet over, say, a day, rather than a single feeding event.”

Failing Chinook runs over the past few decades have helped hinder the recovery of the Southern Residents, while recent abundant runs may have helped spur a baby boom in 2015. A seventh newborn orca was spotted among the Southern Residents in early December, and an eighth about a week later.

“U.S. and Canadian research have found a statistical significance between Chinook numbers and killer whale birth rates,” Ford said.

Over 1.2 million Chinook were counted at the Bonneville Dam, which straddles the Oregon-Washington border, as they swam downstream in 2015, nearing 2013’s record run of more than 1.3 million—the biggest run since 1938.

The federal recovery plan for the Southern Resident killer whales, which dates from 2008, states that the whales need around 200,000 salmon during the summer to thrive, including 143,000 Chinook.

“If they’re fat and happy and getting enough salmon, they’re not using their blubber stores” for energy to forage or to nurture young, said Lynne Barre, the Southern Resident killer whale recovery coordinator with the federal fisheries service.

That’s important because the Southern Resident killer whales have been exposed to toxic pollutants called organochlorines, manufactured chemicals that persist in the environment. These substances impair reproduction and overall health in mammals (including people). When nursing female whales don’t have enough salmon to feed on, they burn their blubber stores to generate fat-rich milk for their calves instead, thereby offloading the toxic chemicals to their offspring.

Excessive exposure to a class of organochlorines called polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, has caused reproductive failure among killer whales in the United Kingdom, and scientists expect them to go extinct as a result.

Ford noted that the Northern Resident killer whales, another group of Pacific coast orcas that prefer Chinook salmon and have faced many years of lean salmon runs, seem to be reproducing more successfully than their cousins to the south.

“It doesn’t appear that lack of salmon has kept them from fairly robust population growth,” Ford said. This suggests to him that Chinook recovery is one of several keys to the recovery of the Southern Residents.

The whales are also dealing with habitat disturbances, including commercial shipping activity, coastal development, and U.S. Navy sonar training exercises in both Puget Sound and the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary on Washington’s outer coast.

In February, the Obama administration announced a plan to include about 9,000 miles of Pacific coastline in the officially designated critical habitat for the Southern Residents. The move came in response to a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity, which used satellite-tracking data to show that the whales travel as far south as Point Reyes, California, in search of fish to eat.

Wildlife officials are now gathering and studying the information they need to finalize the habitat expansion, said Barre, including how much Chinook and other salmon the whales can forage when they leave the inland marine waters of Puget Sound during the fall and winter.

Officials expect to finalize the plan in 2017, Barre said.

Ford said his research team is currently analyzing poop samples collected from the Southern Residents during past winters, aiming to identify the mix of fish they are eating when swimming between California and southern Canada, and that the research will likely play a role in the expansion of the whales’ critical habitat.

“I’m sure the National Marine Fisheries Service is gathering and reviewing the science,” said Sakashita, “but we’d like to see them move a lot faster for the survival of the Southern Resident killer whales.”

Published on takepart and Yahoo News
J
an. 15, 2016

The survival of the world’s most endangered killer whales may hinge on whether another species threatened with extinction can also be saved.

A new study has definitively shown for the first time that Chinook salmon—which are endangered from northern California to Washington and inland to Idaho—comprise 70 percent of the summer diet of the Southern Resident killer whales, three pods of about 89 orcas that live mainly in the inland marine waters of the Pacific Northwest.

The Southern Residents prefer Chinook even at times when other salmon species, such as sockeye and coho, are abundant, according to research published in the journal PLOS ONE.

Scientists and other observers have long known that salmon are the favored prey of the Southern Residents, said Michael Ford, a biologist with the United States National Marine Fisheries Service, who led the study. But the study “reconfirms the importance of Chinook salmon to this particular group of killer whales.”

“To save the orcas, we need healthy salmon runs,” agreed Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director and senior counsel with the Center for Biological Diversity. “I think one of the key things is passage through dams and diversions. We need restoration of the native salmon runs. We also need to take into account water flow and make sure that salmon are getting enough water flow downstream.”

The center is one of many conservation groups advocating for the removal of dams on Washington state’s lower Snake River, arguing that fully unblocking the river is crucial to restoring salmon runs.

Chinook salmon began returning to their historic spawning grounds on Washington state’s Elwha River in 2014, the same year an effort to bring down a century-old dam on the river was completed.

To figure out the role fish play in the orcas’ diet, Ford and his team reviewed DNA analysis of 175 fecal samples—whale poop—collected in the wild between 2006 and 2011.

As past research had proven that these orcas were almost exclusively fish eaters, the team tested the samples for the DNA signatures of different regional fish species to learn which ones the killer whales ate most

“With fecal samples, we get around some of the uncertainty of whether remains on surface [of the water] are representational of the entire diet,” Ford said. “They integrate their diet over, say, a day, rather than a single feeding event.”

Failing Chinook runs over the past few decades have helped hinder the recovery of the Southern Residents, while recent abundant runs may have helped spur a baby boom in 2015. A seventh newborn orca was spotted among the Southern Residents in early December, and an eighth about a week later.

“U.S. and Canadian research have found a statistical significance between Chinook numbers and killer whale birth rates,” Ford said.

Over 1.2 million Chinook were counted at the Bonneville Dam, which straddles the Oregon-Washington border, as they swam downstream in 2015, nearing 2013’s record run of more than 1.3 million—the biggest run since 1938.

The federal recovery plan for the Southern Resident killer whales, which dates from 2008, states that the whales need around 200,000 salmon during the summer to thrive, including 143,000 Chinook.

“If they’re fat and happy and getting enough salmon, they’re not using their blubber stores” for energy to forage or to nurture young, said Lynne Barre, the Southern Resident killer whale recovery coordinator with the federal fisheries service.

That’s important because the Southern Resident killer whales have been exposed to toxic pollutants called organochlorines, manufactured chemicals that persist in the environment. These substances impair reproduction and overall health in mammals (including people). When nursing female whales don’t have enough salmon to feed on, they burn their blubber stores to generate fat-rich milk for their calves instead, thereby offloading the toxic chemicals to their offspring.

Excessive exposure to a class of organochlorines called polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, has caused reproductive failure among killer whales in the United Kingdom, and scientists expect them to go extinct as a result.

Ford noted that the Northern Resident killer whales, another group of Pacific coast orcas that prefer Chinook salmon and have faced many years of lean salmon runs, seem to be reproducing more successfully than their cousins to the south.

“It doesn’t appear that lack of salmon has kept them from fairly robust population growth,” Ford said. This suggests to him that Chinook recovery is one of several keys to the recovery of the Southern Residents.

The whales are also dealing with habitat disturbances, including commercial shipping activity, coastal development, and U.S. Navy sonar training exercises in both Puget Sound and the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary on Washington’s outer coast.

In February, the Obama administration announced a plan to include about 9,000 miles of Pacific coastline in the officially designated critical habitat for the Southern Residents. The move came in response to a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity, which used satellite-tracking data to show that the whales travel as far south as Point Reyes, California, in search of fish to eat.

Wildlife officials are now gathering and studying the information they need to finalize the habitat expansion, said Barre, including how much Chinook and other salmon the whales can forage when they leave the inland marine waters of Puget Sound during the fall and winter.

Officials expect to finalize the plan in 2017, Barre said.

Ford said his research team is currently analyzing poop samples collected from the Southern Residents during past winters, aiming to identify the mix of fish they are eating when swimming between California and southern Canada, and that the research will likely play a role in the expansion of the whales’ critical habitat.

“I’m sure the National Marine Fisheries Service is gathering and reviewing the science,” said Sakashita, “but we’d like to see them move a lot faster for the survival of the Southern Resident killer whales.”