On January 24th, 2015, orca advocates hand delivered a letter to Washington Senator Murray encouraging her to support the breaching of the four lower Snake River dams. Read the letter in full.
There was fascinating news last week about southern resident killer whales that have an extensive connection to the Columbia River. These scientific findings could have a major impact on salmon management and the hydroelectric system.
For many years there were occasional reports of orcas being seen by fishermen working offshore in the Columbia River plume. Starting in 2013, a satellite-tracking program showed how they also range up and down the outer coast. They appear to bide their time, waiting for returning Chinook salmon to begin congregating near the Columbia’s mouth.
Last week’s most attention-grabbing orca news involved a different new technology — use of a camera drone this fall to conduct a thorough survey of the J, K and L pods in Washington’s Puget Sound. Photos reveal the orcas’ everyday behavior, without the drone appearing to disturb them in any way. The 82 famous killer whales are doing very well, with new 2015 calves fattening and additional females showing signs of pregnancy. This is extraordinarily promising news for animals that are counted among the eight most endangered species in the U.S.
This comes in a year of healthy Chinook salmon runs, especially to the Columbia-Snake system. The annual count is now above 1.3 million returnees to Bonneville Dam. Unlike transient killer whales that range around the North Pacific hunting smaller marine mammals, the Puget Sound orcas are strictly fish-eaters, strongly preferring Chinook. This abundant year has clearly set off an enthusiastic round of baby-making.
An unfortunate fact of life for orcas — and everything else that relies on salmon — is that runs fluctuate. This year’s extreme Pacific Northwest drought and the warm El Niño waters now dominating the Pacific may mean a sharp decline in salmon two to four years from now.
A thorough report by The Seattle Times explores the Puget Sound orcas’ strong Columbia River connection:
• “Scales and fish tissue samples from fish kills by orcas has enabled researchers to trace those fish to Canada’s Fraser River in the summer, and the Upper Columbia and Snake River in the winter.”
• “A conservation biologist at the University of Washington … has noticed in his research on orcas that thyroid hormone levels that set metabolic rates are highest when the orcas arrive in late spring, suggesting the whales are arriving in Puget Sound after feeding on a rich food source: spring runs of Columbia Chinook salmon.”
This news is bringing a renewed interest in returning the Snake River to a natural-flow regime, something that would require bypassing four hydroelectric dams. This has been a nonstarter for regional politicians for years. But the amazing popularity of orcas and stringent federal legal protections conferred on them could be a game-changer.
While dam removal could eventually enhance salmon runs, the orca-Columbia connection could also bring additional fishing restrictions, notably in years when salmon are in short supply.
It is anybody’s guess how all this orca news will balance out for local fishermen. But it’s still fun knowing our local waters play such a key part in the lives of this iconic Northwest species. We look forward to many more sightings this winter and next spring.
Dear Lt. Col. Vail:
We write to express concern over comments written by or attributed to you 1) at the
October 3rd Free the Snake Flotilla, 2) in recent letters-to-the editor, 3) in recent news articles,
and 4) on the Corps of Engineers’ current website.
To a participant during the Flotilla event you noted your appreciation for such events
as expressions of American democracy at work. We would hope you also tout an informed
citizenry as crucial to democracy and consider it your mandate as a government official—
particularly one of your rank and influence— to provide the public with accurate, data-verifiable
In light of that mandate, we challenge, as detailed below, several of your recent comments
(in bold): Read the letter in full here…
By Kimberly Cauvel
Skagit Valley Herald
Oct. 16 2015
Even with Endangered Species Act protection, two iconic Salish Sea species are struggling, and a newly formed alliance is calling attention to their plight. Read more…
Idaho’s wild salmon and steelhead are in trouble. Scientists say that at least 2 percent of the young fish migrating to the sea (smolts) must survive and return as adults for Idaho’s salmon and steelhead stocks to sustain themselves. That has happened only twice in the last 17 years. To actually rebuild the populations, scientists say that 4-6 percent must return. In other words, the status quo ensures decline for these fish that define Idaho and the Northwest.
Eight massive dams in the Columbia and Snake rivers that stand between Idaho’s spawning grounds and the Pacific are the biggest factors in the decline of Snake River salmon and steelhead. The slow-moving reservoirs behind the dams are thermal traps that kill fish. In the hot, dry summer of 2015, salmon died when they encountered lethally warm water in the reservoirs behind the four lower Snake River dams. Unlike a free-flowing river where water temperatures cool down at night, reservoirs trap heat and stay hot.
Certainly, dam operators and fish managers should be commended for using the limited tools at their disposal to minimize the loss of Snake River fish, but when we have met the bare minimum smolt-to-adult return ratios in only two of the past 17 years, these efforts fall short.
Without new ideas and a better approach, Idaho’s wild salmon and steelhead will go the way of the passenger pigeon.
Overwhelming scientific evidence supports removal of the four lower Snake River dams as the best way to recover Snake River salmon and steelhead. If there are other actions that can fix the deadly lower Snake River migration corridor, we are all ears. Finding a solution to the continued decline of Idaho’s salmon and steelhead will require looking at the needs of fish and local communities, together.
Two decades of litigation have failed to force the government to take more decisive action to recover Idaho’s oceangoing fish. More than $12 billion has been spent on actions that fail to address the single-most important limiting factor for the fish. Simply put, not enough fish survive passage of the dams.
In 2008, under the leadership of then-Gov. Jim Risch, Idaho brought together sportsmen, counties, environmentalists, industry and others to protect Idaho’s 9 million acres of roadless areas. It wasn’t easy. It required compromise and negotiation. It took time. And it worked.
The government needs to follow Idaho’s lead and bring together farmers, tribes, states, conservation and energy interests, and local communities to save Idaho’s salmon and steelhead.
Only in such a collaborative forum can the stakeholders identify steps that will simultaneously recover the fish and keep communities whole. Sens. Risch and Mike Crapo have both expressed support for such a forum, but it remains elusive.
It isn’t just about the fish. Northwest electricity ratepayers and federal taxpayers provided millions of dollars for habitat restoration. Habitat in rivers such as the Yankee Fork, Lemhi and Pahsimeroi is much improved. Idaho possesses some of the finest salmon habitat on the planet, but if the fish can’t move from the ocean to the mountains and back, that habitat will remain a five-star hotel without guests.
We know how to recover Idaho’s wild salmon and steelhead. And we know how to protect the economic well-being and quality of life of affected local communities. It’s time for the government to step up and do its part.
The status quo of lurching from crisis to crisis offers no potential for recovery. As the deadly summer of 2015 has shown, the need is more urgent than ever.
Chris Wood is the president and CEO of Trout Unlimited, the nation’s oldest and largest coldwater fisheries conservation organization.
By Gary Wockner
Oct. 6 2015
As we stood on our boards and paddled away from the cove at Malpais and turned south past the wave-break, I felt a rush of what Costa Ricans call pura vida—“pure life.” Read more…
by Scott Herning
Southern Resident Killer Whale Chinook Salmon Initiative
(This article appeared in the Oct. 14 2015 edition of The Journal of the San Juan Islands)
Recently, a contingent of San Juan Islanders joined three hundred fishermen, Native Americans, farmers, orca activists, business owners and conservationists to advocate breaching four federal dams on the lower Snake River in Southeast Washington. Canoes, kayaks, rafts and drift-boats filled the Snake River near Pullman, Washington. People came from as far away as Alabama to paddle three miles to Lower Granite Dam. There, boaters unfurled a massive floating banner to “Free the Snake”.
The protesters carried signs reading: ‘A River of Negligible Use. Corps of Engineers’ or ‘Something is Happening Here’ Another sign read ‘More Salmon, More Orcas.’
What ‘was’ going on here? How could the Snake River, the largest tributary of the Columbia River, be thought of as ‘insignificant’ by our Government? Together these rivers were once the greatest salmon producers on earth.
How could removing dams save orcas? Easy. The dams have been killing millions of Chinook salmon for nearly 50 years.
Chinook, one of four species of ESA-listed salmon on the Snake, is the preferred prey for the Southern Resident orcas. Starvation is a top threat facing these highly social whales. NOAA’s 2008 Recovery Plan states; “the single greatest change in food availability for Resident orcas since the late 1800s has been the decline of salmon from the Columbia basin.”
The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned NOAA to include these orcas as Endangered; that happened in 2005. A decade later the feds are again being challenged, this time to revise the Southern Resident critical habitat to include coastal waters, which of course, includes the mouth of the mighty Columbia River.
Dam hydropower mistakenly has been thought of as clean energy. That is changing. According to a University of Cincinnati biogeochemist, in 2012 a large Ohio reservoir emitted as much methane, a potent greenhouse gas, as roughly 5800 dairy cows emit over an entire year. Add this to the fact that the lower Snake dams impede access to 5500 miles of cool, climate change resistant salmon spawning and rearing streams, and you have a strong new case that hydropower from dams is indeed ‘dirty energy.’
In the past year, close to 150,000 citizens (through petitions and email campaigns) have supported breaching the four lower Snake River dams to save salmon and orcas. The issue has reached national media attention with articles appearing in National Geographic, Huffington Post, and The New York Times. Leading environmental organizations such as Endangered Species Coalition, Patagonia, Oceana and Whale and Dolphin Conservation are also on board.
Use your superpower. Call our Commander-in-Chief (202-456-1111) and Senators Murray (206-553-5545) and Cantwell (206-220-6400) to tell them we support breaching the four lower Snake River dams to save the Southern Resident orcas. We owe it to the forty-five Southern Resident orcas who were violently captured and sold to marine parks during the construction of these dams. Only one of those Southern Residents remains alive in captivity today, Tokitae, aka Lolita.
Take action at www.srkwcsi.org
On October 3 hundreds of Pacific Northwest residents are gathering to paddle on lower Granite Lake, the reservoir created by Lower Granite Dam, one of four destructive dams on the lower Snake River. All are welcome to join for this historic event.
The point is to gather as a community to draw attention to the ongoing taxpayer waste and environmental destruction wrought by the four lower Snake River dams. The point is also to come together as a community. Whether advocates for common-sense spending of taxpayer dollars, endangered southern resident killer whales, energy reform, endangered salmon or better transportation alternatives, we have a common cause. which is removal of four wasteful, salmon-killing dams on the lower Snake.
Follow this link for more details and to register. And please join us Oct. 3 to tell our elected leaders it’s time to remove the lower Snake River dams. It’s time to free the Snake.
Two petitions are circulating this summer that can help bring about change for Northwest salmon, Puget Sound orcas and taxpayers whose dollars are being wasted supporting a broken status quo on the lower Snake River of eastern Washington.
Though seeking the same outcomes, the petitions ask for different political tactics. The White House petition, which has only been in circulation for a couple of weeks, has generated 390 signatures so far and asks President Obama to issue an executive order to remove the four dams on the lower Snake River.
The other petition, posted to Change.org several months ago, has generated more than 15,000 signatures and seeks Congressional authorization of dam removal on the lower Snake River.
“Each year the Snake River dams kill many millions of chinook salmon juveniles as they attempt to navigate the dams and migrate down river and out to the ocean,” according to the Change.org petition. “Despite the dams, some chinook salmon do make it to the ocean and grow to adults. The dams again exact their toll when adult chinook return to the Columbia/Snake watershed to spawn. The dams finish the killing cycle by impeding the chinooks’ return to their spawning grounds.”
In its 2002 Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Report, the Walla Walla District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers vastly understated the costs of maintaining and operating four dams on the lower Snake River in eastern Washington State. The report concluded that modifications to these dams would result in the recovery of 13 species of threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead, and that the economic benefits of keeping the four Lower Snake River dams in place far exceeded those of a free flowing river.
An honest economic analysis turns the conclusion of the Lower Snake River Feasibility Report on its head. The belief that we cannot afford to breach the lower Snake River dams is false. The opposite is true. Neither the American public, nor the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, can afford to keep the four lower Snake River dams in place.
The economic analysis that led to the Walla Walla District’s 2002 decision to keep the dams is seriously flawed. A professional reevaluation of the 2002 report—correcting earlier cost projections with now available actual costs and addressing omissions, errors, miscalculations and faulty assumptions—demonstrates the Walla Walla District understated the true cost of keeping the dams in place by a staggering $140 million on an average annual basis. A reevaluation of the claimed economic benefits of keeping the dams in place will be addressed in a separate report.
Civil Engineer Jim Waddell recently completed the reanalysis presented here. Waddell retired from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2013 after 35 years with the agency and was the Deputy District Engineer for Programs in the Walla Walla District when the Lower Snake River Feasibility Report was finalized. The Walla Walla District’s faulty analysis and unfounded conclusions in the Lower Snake River Feasibility Report have cost the American public hundreds of millions, and perhaps billions, of dollars in actual expenditures and lost benefits.
- Follow this link to read the report in full: Cost LSR Dams 1-1-2015F-2 vers 7 30 15
- Click here to read a rebuttal to a critique made by the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association: PNWA Wagner Rebuttal 7 29 2015
- Attachment one: Alt 3 Base year 2001 – 6 88 percent COEBPA Sum Cost for Cost Sheet
- Attachment two: Alt 3 Base year 2015 – 6 88 percent COEBPA Sum Cost rev 13mar15
- Attachment three: Alt 3 Base year 200115 – 4 75 percent COEBPA Sum Costs rev 15Mar15